Archive for the 'Geo-Political' Category


Pity the nation…

Pity the nation whose people are sheep,
and whose shepherds mislead them.
Pity the nation whose leaders are liars, whose sages are silenced,
and whose bigots haunt the airwaves.
Pity the nation that raises not its voice,
except to praise conquerors and acclaim the bully as hero
and aims to rule the world with force and by torture.
Pity the nation that knows no other language but its own
and no other culture but its own.
Pity the nation whose breath is money
and sleeps the sleep of the too well fed.
Pity the nation—oh, pity the people who allow their rights to erode
and their freedoms to be washed away.
My country, tears of thee, sweet land of liberty.
by LAWRENCE FERLINGHETTI (2007)

Ron Paul commented on the issue of global warming and warned of “the fear-mongering” and encouraged contrarian thinking on the issue during an interview with host Layla Kayleigh of G4.

Paul said, “People think that Greenland’s going to be gone in 20 years - I don’t buy into that…but I think man contributed to it.”

Asked if he bought into “the ice glaciers melting,” Paul responded, “They can find just as many places where the ice is building up - in Greenland, in certain parts of Greenland, in Antarctica.”

Indeed, research conducted using the European Space Agency’s satellites in November 2005 concluded that Greenland’s interior ice sheets are thickening at a rate of six centimetres each year.

Dr. Paul responded pointedly when challenged by Kayleigh, who used to work for Al Gore’s TV network, “My advice is strongly this: listen to the scientists on both sides - people who have make up their mind. There’s something in investing, it’s contrarian investment, when everybody knows ‘this is the thing’ - watch out. The contrarian does something else. And right now there needs to be a little contrarian thinking about the fear-mongering that’s going on with global warming like it’s the end of the earth.”

Ron Paul emboldens the cognitive style of a contrarian thinker - seeing black when others see white, opportunity instead of failure. That’s one of his greatest gifts to the world of ideas and politics: the expansion of a group’s perspective to see problems in a new light.

Inconvenient Truthers, most of whom support democratic candidates such as Al Gore, see this issue as critical and the establishment and MSM seems to agree heralding the former Vice President’s Nobel Peace Prize. Ron Paul is testing the boundaries on the global warming debate and challenging the status quo. In the usual Paul way, he isn’t playing partisan politics or pandering to any group. This type of statement does nothing to convert democrats and independents, but rather he continues to be the voice of reason when reason seems thrown out the window…the voice of dissent when others follow the line…the contrarian thinker when perspective is required.

Asked if there was any country in the world that he admires for their social and political values besides the United States, Paul said “I sorta like Switzerland…because nobody knows the name of the president. And they have Cantons, which are individual states, they have various languages, and they always stay neutral in world wars. They are well armed and they have a militia and everybody has big guns in their house. They don’t have crime and violence. It’s not a centralized government. So, in many ways, they are very much like a republic, like we’re supposed to be like.”

Some believe that most glaciers in Switzerland will completely disappear by 2080, leaving nothing but valleys and slopes - and that global warming is our primary concern. Others believe our primary concern is that America’s sovereignty will disappear soon leaving nothing but another failed freedom experiment. Contrarians like Paul say that in both cases we have opportunity instead of failure.



Imagine all the people, the men and women of the United States military under a Ron Paul presidency, on a day that our troops from around the globe are ordered to march out of these nations we occupy and just come home to defend our country. And just like they marched in - with our heads held high and plans with hope for the future, but minus the “Desert Storm” or “Operation Enduring Freedom” fighting words and gunfire and lies. And then imagine all the people, the citizens of these occupied nations - some of these countries under long-term occupation - cheering in their streets in celebration and waving their flags as they are no longer under siege by the American Empire. That is a certain victory and sending a message of peace.

Imagine all the people in America with their yellow ribbons and the good old red, white and blue flags waving proudly to welcome home our troops…again in undeniable victory and sending a message of peace and hope and in the humble example we are capable of displaying to the world. The ideas of peace and liberty will do more to mend our strained relations with all nations than bombs and bullets, the threats and rhetoric. So why are all the other candidates talking about preemptive strikes against Iran and leaving all options on the table? The men and women of our military clearly support Ron Paul’s proposed humble foreign policy and have donated more money to Dr. Paul’s campaign than any other candidate. They are saying NO to endless war and the continued war propaganda.

72% of American’s want our troops sent home from Iraq - in what many say has already descended into a civil war. Even Dick Cheney said in 1994 that it would be a quagmire to invade Iraq. It was a mistake to go, and it’s a mistake to stay. And now many, including Greenspan and Kissinger and also allied nations such as Australia, are admitting that is was a mistake and that we actually went to war against a sovereign nation over oil. We spend trillions of dollars to maintain our empire overseas and secure oil and wrestle for power. We spend countless lives to counter terrorism, thus the 100 year war as termed by the Bush Administration, since we can never really win a war against this enemy without a nation - the modern day bogeyman.

In Ron Paul’s words:

“We can achieve much more in peace than we can ever achieve in these needless, unconstitutional, undeclared wars!”

All initiation of force is a violation of someone else’s rights, whether initiated by an individual or the state, for the benefit of an individual or group of individuals, even if it’s supposed to be for the benefit of another individual or group of individuals.”

“How did we win the election in the year 2000? We talked about a humble foreign policy: No nation-building; don’t police the world. That’s conservative, it’s Republican, it’s pro-American - it follows the founding fathers. And, besides, it follows the Constitution.

“I am just absolutely convinced that the best formula for giving us peace and preserving the American way of life is freedom, limited government, and minding our own business overseas.”

“I believe that when we overdo our military aggressiveness, it actually weakens our national defense. I mean, we stood up to the Soviets. They had 40,000 nuclear weapons. Now we’re fretting day in and day and night about third-world countries that have no army, navy or air force.

“Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms.

Imagine all the people…living life in peace…in a Ron Paul American Republic.

Next »