Jan 9th, 2008
New Hampshire Vote Fraud? Don’t take my vote bro!
The media and blogosphere are on fire tonight and many American’s are fired up as well over the New Hampshire Primary. Record turnout and the grand raucous political theater took over in the Live Free or Die state today. But some are claiming that their vote has not been counted. And now multiple accusations of vote fraud having surfaced on the internet and phone calls poured into C-Span have many crying foul. The U.S. D.O.J. and New Hampshire D.O.J. / GOP and New Hampshire Department of State are being flooded with requests for a recount.
In a post on The Daily Paul, the individual under the screen name asnitko, states:
“My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn’t corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???”
In this post, the individual under the screen name sstjean states:
“This was posted to ronpaul-801 tonight: “This town numbers are wrong wrong wrong on this map. I am from Sutton originally and my parents and one aunt all voted for Ron Paul today and Sutton says 0. So this is wrong. This is a town that had 20 people counting the ballots and I have no reason to believe that they cheated. Small town and I was born and raised there. The real numbers will come in by morning. The electronic machines in the big towns are the ones we have to worry about.”
To this time, Sutton, near Lake Sunapee in the west central area and rural, still shows ‘0′ votes for Ron Paul. This individual is reportedly filing a formal complaint. An official affidavit has not been confirmed yet. 8 votes were, however, reported under ‘other’ and many other townships logged higher than average ‘other’ votes also.
Many argue that Ron Paul did well placing 5th with 8% and just behind Giuliani, but many supporters are frustrated having hoped for a better finish. Even with it’s libertarian streak, New Hampshire is becoming a Democratic New England state, and has been going in that direction for some time. And the Democrats got out the vote.
Clinton, gaining 14%-15% from previous polls, claimed a surprising victory on the Democrat side and says she “found her voice” during the New Hampshire Primary battle. Meanwhile Obama, who had nearly lost his voice on the campaign trail, finished close behind. Clinton’s showing tear-filled emotions, some claim, have propelled her into the lead for now as she’s picked up 9 more delegates. But some Obama supporters have claimed something foul went on tonight.
McCain, with a commanding lead over all the GOP, was announced victorious early in the evening, prompting some speculation that it was too early for the media to call it. But the vote % stayed very consistent all evening, never changing by more than a few percentage points.
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris warned today that New Hampshire’s electronic voting machines are wide open to fraud. And Michael Collins notes that the backdoor is open for vote fraud:
“81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as “Premier”). The elections run on these machines are programmed by one company, LHS Associates, based in Methuen, MA. We know nothing about the people programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots. People like to say “but we use paper ballots! They can always be counted by hand!”
And Kurt Nimmo notes:
“But they’re not. They’re counted by Diebold. Only a candidate can request a hand recount, and most never do so. And a rigged election can easily become a rigged recount, as we learned in Ohio 2004, where two election officials were convicted of rigging their recount….”
Will Ron Paul’s camp ask for a recount? Or how about Obama’s? History says that it’s not likely. Perhaps it’s up to the people? Who else is going to take this country back?
Some suggestions to take action on this issue:
Contact the Ron Paul campaign and fill out an affidavit and get it notarized: www.ronpaulvotecount.com http://www.watchthevote2008.com/
Using the Voter Verification Affidavit when your ballot is being processed by ANY VOTING MACHINE, COMPUTER OR SCANNING DEVICE.
New Hampshire Affidavit (There are 302 polling places in New Hampshire. 137 use paper ballots and are counted in the open before all witnesses. These 137, such as Richmond, New Hampshire, are conducting an open, verifiable, constitutional election. 175 polling places are using computers to optical scan paper ballots. The ballots then disappear into the computer. In New Hampshire, the law allows each polling place to take the ballots out of the computer at the close of the polls (about 7 PM EST in most places in NH), and count the paper ballots in front of all witnesses. IF any local polling place will not remove the paper ballots from the computer and count they in the open, then these polling places are running an unconstitutional election, and every voter at such polling places must use a Voter Verification Affidavit to make sure his or her vote counts. In other words, if we get 80 affidavits for candidate X, and the computer count only shows 40 votes for candidate X, we have proof of a fraudulent computer count. Click here for the New Hampshire Affidavit.’
Download Voter Verification Affadavits to hand out at polls:
http://www.libertybroadcastnetwork.o…-program-.html
(Voters should hang onto the original and mail a copy).
Many are also alerting the below contacts requesting a recount by hand for recertification:
electionlaw@doj.nh.gov, elections@sos.state.nh.us, USANH.Webmail@usdoj.gov
“It’s not who votes that counts. It’s who counts the votes.” Joseph Stalin.
2 Responses to “New Hampshire Vote Fraud? Don’t take my vote bro!”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This blog is simply smashing. In my humble opinion of course. As this post is rather debatable I don’t think all your blog visitors are going to agree with it.
I’m a person, who knows what she wants. I’m not the one who has a lot of free time to write comments here and discuss stupid and silly news, like you do. It’s so funny that you all take it seriously, start thinking about it and so on. I would never spend my time on such stupidity. I just want to say that there’s a real word, where you can spread rumors and argue. Why are you doing this online? You look so funny!